Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Ampere
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
180 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy