Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +290%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy