NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X
+709%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2688
Shading Units
256
224
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
