Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +2%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +15%
372
Quadro P2200
322
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm
63
Quadro P2200
63
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
2688
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy