CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
VS
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+1298%
14.38 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
VS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
72
448
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
900W
TDP
260W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
2
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
3
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
4
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
6
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
7
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
8
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
10
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy