Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +822%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2017
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy