A10G vs Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+6385%
31520
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
486
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
8
9216
Shading Units
256
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
142W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF100
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
