AMD EPYC 8324P vs Intel Xeon Phi SE10X
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Intel Xeon Phi SE10X with 61 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8324P 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 300W)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Nov 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
300 W
75 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
61
64
Total Thread Count
244
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
11.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
6
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
96
PCIe Lanes
-
