AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7250F
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9015 with 8 cores 3.6GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7250F with 68 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9015 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (125W vs 230W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Package
16.63 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
230 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
2x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.6 GHz
8
Total Core Count
68
16
Total Thread Count
272
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
14.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
