Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9115 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

AMD EPYC 9115 vs Intel Xeon W 3365

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9115 with 16 cores 2.6GHz and Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9115 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 48MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (125W vs 270W)
Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.6GHz)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jul 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Ice Lake-W
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)

Package

16.63 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
270 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
81 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
2x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

16
Performance Cores
-
32
Performance Core Threads
-
2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
16
Total Core Count
32
32
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.0
Multiplier
27.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
48 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
8
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
4
128
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy