Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon W 2102

AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon W 2102

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9474F with 48 cores 3.6GHz and Intel Xeon W 2102 with 4 cores 2.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9474F 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.9GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 8.25MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon W 2102 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9474F +136%
2117
Intel Xeon W 2102
894
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9474F +731%
23699
Intel Xeon W 2102
2849
VS

General Parameters

Nov 2022
Release Date
Aug 2017
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Skylake-W
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 2066
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon W (Skylake-W)

Package

52.56 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
120 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
66 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
48
Total Core Count
4
96
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
29.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
8.25 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
12
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
48

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy