Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9645 vs Opteron 6278

AMD EPYC 9645 vs Opteron 6278

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz and Opteron 6278 with 16 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 6278 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.3GHz)
Lower TDP (115W vs 320W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Interlagos
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket G34
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Interlagos)

Package

Transistor Count
2.4 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
115 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
mm²
Die Size
316 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

96
Performance Cores
-
192
Performance Core Threads
-
2.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
96
Total Core Count
16
192
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
23.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
768 K
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
16 MB
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB per die
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
4

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
2
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy