Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Xeon E7520

AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Xeon E7520

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz and Xeon E7520 with 4 cores 1.866GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 1333)
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.866GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 45nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Xeon E7520 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (18MB vs 8MB)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2010
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Nehalem-EX
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 1567
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon(Beckton)

Package

4.8 billions
Transistor Count
2.3 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
95 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
684 mm²

CPU Performance

2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.866 GHz
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
4
Total Core Count
4
4
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
14.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
18 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
8

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR3-1333
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
2
32
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy