AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Opteron 6212
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Opteron 6212 with 8 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 1600)
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 115W)
Opteron 6212 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2011
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Interlagos
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
AMD Socket G34
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Opteron (Interlagos)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
2.4 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
115 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
213 mm²
Die Size
2x315 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
8
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
13.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
768 KB
512 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per module
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB per die
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
4
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR3-1600
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
2
32
PCIe Lanes
-
