Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon W 11955M

AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon W 11955M

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Xeon W 11955M with 8 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)
Xeon W 11955M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
789
Xeon W 11955M +178%
2199
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
Xeon W 11955M +374%
9895
VS

General Parameters

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Tiger Lake-H
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel BGA 1787
N/A
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 750
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon (Tiger Lake-H)

Package

4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
35 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
72 °C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

CPU Performance

1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
8
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
21.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
32
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy