AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon X5365
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz and Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 65nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Xeon X5365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
+147%
789
Xeon X5365
319
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
+43%
2087
Xeon X5365
1459
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2007
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 771
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
0.582 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
30 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
213 mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
9.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
2
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
0
32
PCIe Lanes
-
