AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Opteron 8360 SE
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 with 8 cores 2.5GHz and Opteron 8360 SE with 4 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 667)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 65nm)
Lower TDP (55W vs 119W)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Barcelona
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
AMD Socket Fr2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Opteron(Barcelona)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
0.463 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
55 W
Power Consumption
119 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
213 mm²
Die Size
285 mm²
CPU Performance
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
4
16
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
12.5
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
2 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR2-667
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
-
32
PCIe Lanes
-
