AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Xeon 6325P
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 with 8 cores 2.5GHz and Xeon 6325P with 4 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 12MB)
Xeon 6325P 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2025
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-R
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
55 W
Power Consumption
55 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
213 mm²
Die Size
163 mm²
CPU Performance
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
8
Total Core Count
4
16
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
35.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
2
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
5
32
PCIe Lanes
16
