Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 vs Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2

AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 vs Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 with 32 cores 3.25GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2 with 8 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.25GHz vs 3GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 25MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 +149%
1934
Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2
775
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9354 +363%
20933
Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2
4512
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 2011
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-EP)

Package

52.56 billions
Transistor Count
2.8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
280 W
Power Consumption
130 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
341 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

3.25 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
32
Total Core Count
8
64
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.5
Multiplier
30.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
25 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3-1866
12
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy