AMD EPYC Embedded 9454 vs Intel Xeon Phi 5110P
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9454 with 48 cores 2.75GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 5110P with 60 cores 1.053GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9454 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.75GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 5110P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 290W)
Score
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
52.56 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
290 W
Power Consumption
225 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.75 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.053 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
48
Total Core Count
60
96
Total Thread Count
240
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.5
Multiplier
10.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
