Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5320H

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5320H

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Gold 5320H with 20 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2667)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 27.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Gold 5320H 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 360W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Cooper Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Gold (Cooper Lake-SP)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
150 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
96
Total Core Count
20
192
Total Thread Count
40
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
27.5 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
4

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2667
12
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
48

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy