AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Opteron X2 180
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Opteron X2 180 with 2 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 400)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)
Opteron X2 180 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 360W)
Score
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Denmark
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
0.233 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
110 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
12x72 mm²
Die Size
199 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
2
192
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
128 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR1-400
12
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
