Home Comparison AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +163%
2075
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +475%
22897
Centaur CHA
3982
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +188%
1467
Centaur CHA
508
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +2186%
77251
Centaur CHA
3379
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12x72 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
96
Total Core Count
8
192
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
12
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy