AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Opteron 6220
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Opteron 6220 with 8 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1600)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 6220 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (115W vs 360W)
Score
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2011
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Interlagos
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket G34
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Opteron (Interlagos)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
2.4 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
115 W
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12x72 mm²
Die Size
2x315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
96
Total Core Count
8
192
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
768 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per module
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB per die
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
4
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3-1600
12
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
2
128
PCIe Lanes
-
