AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Opteron X1150
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Opteron X1150 with 4 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 28nm)
Opteron X1150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 360W)
Score
General Parameters
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Kyoto
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket FT3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Opteron (X-Series)
Package
78.84 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
17 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
12x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
4
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
20.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
