AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs Intel Celeron J4005

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

Intel Celeron J4005

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 3 1300X with 4 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (39.74GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X +192%

1055

Intel Celeron J4005

361

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X +411%

3185

Intel Celeron J4005

623

Geekbench 5 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X +104%

900

Intel Celeron J4005

440

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X +274%

3060

Intel Celeron J4005

817

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X +93%

2099

Intel Celeron J4005

1087

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X +337%

6910

Intel Celeron J4005

1578

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

VS

Intel Celeron J4005

General Parameters

Jul 2017

Release Date

Dec 2017

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen

Core Architecture

Gemini Lake

-

Processor Number

J4005

AM4

Socket

BGA-1090

N/A

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 600

Package

4.8 billions

Transistor Count

-

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

10 W

95 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

2

4

Performance Core Threads

2

3.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

4

Total Core Count

2

4

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

34x

Multiplier

-

96 K per core

L1 Cache

48 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

4 MB per core

8 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

64 GB

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

39.74 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

35.76 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

700 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.14 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

Official Website

Intel Celeron J4005

3.0

PCIe Version

2.0

20

PCIe Lanes

6

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs Intel Core i5 10600K

2

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs Intel Core i3 14100T

3

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs Intel Core i9 14901KE

4

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

5

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600

6

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs Intel Core i7 9800X

7

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

8

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

9

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL

10

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU