AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Intel Core i3 13100F

VS

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X with 6 cores 3.6GHz and Intel Core i3 13100F with 4 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 12MB)

Intel Core i3 13100F 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR4-2666)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 39.74GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Lower TDP (58W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

930

Intel Core i3 13100F +84%

1719

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

6409

Intel Core i3 13100F +37%

8817

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

1039

Intel Core i3 13100F +105%

2140

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

4315

Intel Core i3 13100F +67%

7235

Geekbench 5 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

988

Intel Core i3 13100F +70%

1688

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

5881

Intel Core i3 13100F +22%

7189

Passmark CPU Single Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

2197

Intel Core i3 13100F +69%

3719

Passmark CPU Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

13019

Intel Core i3 13100F +17%

15354

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

VS

Intel Core i3 13100F

General Parameters

Apr 2017

Release Date

Jan 2023

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Zen

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake

-

Processor Number

i3-13100F

AM4

Socket

LGA-1700

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Package

4.8 billions

Transistor Count

-

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

AM4

Socket

LGA-1700

95 W

Power Consumption

58 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

89 W

95 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

4

12

Performance Core Threads

8

3.6 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

6

Total Core Count

4

12

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

36x

Multiplier

34x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

512 K per core

L2 Cache

1280 K per core

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

12 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

64 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

39.74 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

-

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Official Website

Intel Core i3 13100F

3.0

PCIe Version

5.0

24

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

2

Intel Core i7 7820X vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

3

Intel Core i5 14600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

4

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

5

Intel Core i9 10980XE vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

6

Intel Core i5 14500 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

7

Intel Core i5 10400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

8

Intel Core i3 13100F vs Intel Core i5 12400F

9

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600

10

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Intel Core i5 6600

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD