Home Comparison AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Celeron J1900

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Celeron J1900

We compared two desktop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with 4 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (2933 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (43.71GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (12nm vs 22nm)
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G +539%
1170
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G +483%
3331
Intel Celeron J1900
571
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2019
Release Date
Nov 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Picasso
Core Architecture
Bay Trail
-
Processor Number
J1900
AM4
Socket
FCBGA1170
Radeon RX Vega 11
Integrated Graphics
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series

Package

4.9 billions
Transistor Count
-
12 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
45-65 W
Power Consumption
10 W
95 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C

CPU Performance

4
Performance Cores
4
8
Performance Core Threads
4
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.42 GHz
4
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
37x
Multiplier
20x
96 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR3L-1333
64 GB
Max Memory Size
8 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
43.71 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
688 MHz
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
854 MHz
704
Shader Units
-
44
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
11
Execution Units
-
65 W
Power Consumption
-
3840x2160 - 60 Hz
Max Resolution
-
1.746 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.04 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

3.0
PCIe Version
2.0
8
PCIe Lanes
4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy