AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with 12 cores 3.0GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100 with 10 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX 's Advantages

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4.0)

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 8 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 5200)

Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)

Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 3.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm)

Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +24%

1864

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

1496

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +115%

26641

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

12347

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +9%

2600

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

2378

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

12851

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100 +3%

13297

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

General Parameters

Jan 2023

Release Date

Sep 2024

AMD

Manufacturer

Qualcomm

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

ARMv9

Zen 4 (Dragon Range)

Core Architecture

Snapdragon X

-

Processor Number

X1E-66-100

FL1

Socket

Custom

Radeon 610M

Integrated Graphics

Qualcomm Adreno X1

Package

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

4 nm

45-75 W

Power Consumption

23 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

CPU Performance

12

Performance Cores

10

24

Performance Core Threads

10

3.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

5.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

12

Total Core Count

10

24

Total Thread Count

10

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

30x

Multiplier

34x

64 K per core

L1 Cache

-

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

-

64 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5200

Memory Types

LPDDR5X-8448

64 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

83.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

135 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

1500 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

500 MHz

2200 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

128

Shader Units

1536

8

Texture Units

48

4

Raster Operation Units

6

2

Execution Units

6

15 W

Power Consumption

-

0.49 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

3.7 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

Official Website

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

5.0

PCIe Version

4.0

28

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Intel Processor N200

2

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

3

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7545U

4

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000

5

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Apple M1 Pro

6

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

7

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125U

8

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

9

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Apple M3

10

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Intel Core i5 1235U

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU