Home Comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Celeron 4205U

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Celeron 4205U

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
VS
Intel Celeron 4205U
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Intel Celeron 4205U
We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 with 8 cores 2GHz and Intel Celeron 4205U with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Higher specification of memory (8000 vs 2133)
Larger memory bandwidth (128GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Intel Celeron 4205U 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 54W)

Score

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
VS
Intel Celeron 4205U

General Parameters

Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2019
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Strix Halo
Core Architecture
Whiskey Lake
-
Processor Number
4205U
AMD Socket FP8
Socket
BGA-1528
32CU(Unknown)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610
Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo))
Generation
-

Package

Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
15-54 W
Power Consumption
15 W
W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
2
16
Performance Core Threads
2
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
5.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
0
Efficiency Cores
-
Efficiency Core Threads
-
0 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
0 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
8
Total Core Count
2
16
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
20.0
Multiplier
-
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
64 MB
L3 Cache
2 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5X-8000
Memory Types
DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866
96 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
128 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
37.5 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
GPU Base Frequency
200 MHz
MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
900 MHz
Shader Units
96
Texture Units
12
Raster Operation Units
2
32
Execution Units
12
Power Consumption
5 W
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 30 Hz
0 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.06 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

AMD Ryzen™ AI
NPU
-
55 TOPS
Theoretical performance
-

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Official Website
Intel Celeron 4205U
4
PCIe Version
2.0
16
PCIe Lanes
12
-
Extended Instruction Set
SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i7 8557U
2
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i7 13650HX
3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U
4
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
6
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Celeron 4205U
7
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i5 8257U
8
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
9
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Core i5 10210Y
10
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

Related News

1
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
2
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
3
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
4
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
5
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
6
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
7
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
8
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
9
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
10
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy