Arc A370M vs FirePro M5100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (1550MHz vs 775MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+219%
3174
FirePro M5100
992
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
+394%
3440
FirePro M5100
696
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Venus
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Venus XT
(216-0846000)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
