Home Comparison Arc A370M vs FirePro M5950

Arc A370M vs FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A370M +356%
3174
FirePro M5950
696

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Whistler
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net