Arc A370M vs FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (1550MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+359%
3174
FirePro W4190M
691
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2015
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Opal
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
