Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1550MHz vs 1335MHz)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
3174
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+29%
4101
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
3440
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+44%
4973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
1599
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+44%
2304
Blender
Arc A370M
251
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+246%
870
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2019
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
