Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 965M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1550MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+34%
3174
GeForce GTX 965M
2355
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
+91%
3440
GeForce GTX 965M
1800
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
+100%
1599
GeForce GTX 965M
798
Blender
Arc A370M
+88%
251
GeForce GTX 965M
133
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2016
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
935 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GM206S
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
