Arc A370M vs GeForce MX130
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1550MHz vs 1189MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+247%
3174
GeForce MX130
913
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
+440%
3440
GeForce MX130
637
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
+813%
1599
GeForce MX130
175
Blender
Arc A370M
+225%
251
GeForce MX130
77
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2017
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1109 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1189 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.512 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.54 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
913.2 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.54 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GM108
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
