Arc A370M vs GeForce MX350
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1550MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+164%
3174
GeForce MX350
1199
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
+179%
3440
GeForce MX350
1232
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
+617%
1599
GeForce MX350
223
Blender
Arc A370M
+105%
251
GeForce MX350
122
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GP107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
