Arc A380 vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2050MHz vs 1770MHz)
A2 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
4198
A2
+7%
4531
Blender
Arc A380
524
A2
+72%
902
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
10
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
40
8
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GA107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
