Arc A380 vs FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+2086%
4198
FireGL V5600
192
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
1024
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
89W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV630
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
