Arc A380 vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+5147%
4198
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
May 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
M93
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
