Arc A380 vs FirePro S7150 x2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 265W)
FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+27%
4198
FirePro S7150 x2
3297
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Feb 2016
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Tonga
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
