Arc A380 vs FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+550%
4198
FirePro W4100
645
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A380
+800%
4277
FirePro W4100
475
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
