Arc A380 vs FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)
FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+5%
4198
FirePro W9000
3994
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
