Arc A380 vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+249%
4198
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
