Arc A380 vs GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+4413%
4198
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
93
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Apr 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
