Arc A380 vs GeForce G210 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 8.064GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
GeForce G210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+9662%
4198
GeForce G210 OEM
43
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
May 2009
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.064GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
43.20 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G96C
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
