Arc A380 vs GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+4564%
4198
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
90
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G96C
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
