Arc A380 vs GeForce GT 420 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 420 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 420 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+3032%
4198
GeForce GT 420 OEM
134
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Sep 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.400 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.800 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
134.4 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF108
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF108-200-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
