Arc A380 vs GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+984%
4198
GeForce GTS 250
387
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A380
+290%
4277
GeForce GTS 250
1094
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
