Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+683%
4198
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
536
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
1024
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
